763] (88). Pajcini V, Chen XG, Bormett RW, Geib SJ, Li P, Asher SA, Lidiak EG. Glycylglycine -* and Charge Transfer Transition Moment Orientations: Close to Resonance Raman Single Crystal Measurements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996; 118:9716?726. (89). Dragomir I, Measey TJ, Hagarman AM, Schweitzer-Stenner R. Environment-Controlled Interchromophore Charge Transfer Transitions in Dipeptides Probed by Uv Absorption and Electronic Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006; 110:13235?3241. [PubMed: 16805637] (90). Measey T, Schweitzer-Stenner R. The Conformations Adopted by the Octamer Peptide (Aaka)two in Aqueous Resolution Probed by Ftir and Polarized Raman Spectroscopy. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2006; 37:248?54. (91). Kaur H, Sasidhar YU. For the Sequence Ykgq, the Turn and Extended Conformational Forms Are Separated by Small Barriers along with the Turn Propensity Persists Even at Higher Temperatures: Implications for Protein Folding. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2012; 116:3850?860. [PubMed: 22385393] (92). Duan Y, et al. A Point-Charge Force Field for Molecular Mechanics Simulations of Proteins Based on Condensed-Phase Quantum Mechanical Calculations. J. Compt. Chem. 2003; 24:1999?2012. [PubMed: 14531054] (93). Nerenberg P, Head-Gordon T. Optimizing Protein-Solvent Force Fields to Reproduce Conformational Preferences of Model Peptides.3-Methyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline In stock J. Chem. Theo. Comp. 2011; four:1220?230. (94). Most effective RB, Hummer G. Optimized Molecular Dynamics Force Fields Applied towards the Helix-Coil Transition of Polypeptides. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2009; 113:9004?015. [PubMed: 19514729] (95). Maladier-Jugroot C, Bowron DT, Soper a. K. Johnson ME, Head-Gordon T. Structure and Water Dynamics of Aqueous Peptide Options in the Present of Co-Solvents. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010; 12:382?92. [PubMed: 20023816] (96). Kim S, Hochstrasser RM. The 2d Ir Responses of Amide and Carbonyl Modes in Water Can’t Be Described by Gaussian Frequency Fluctuations. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2007; 111:9697?701. [PubMed: 17665944]NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptJ Phys Chem B. Author manuscript; accessible in PMC 2014 April 11.Toal et al.PageNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptJ Phys Chem B. Author manuscript; offered in PMC 2014 April 11.Figure 1.Cationic AAA (upper panel), AdP (middle panel), and cationic GAG peptide (lower panel). Atoms depicted in red have been those applied in radial distribution function calculations g(r), while those depicted in blue have been monitored for distance as a function in the dihedral angle (see Figure 1 A-C).1411774-27-0 custom synthesis Toal et al.PMID:33475440 PageNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptJ Phys Chem B. Author manuscript; obtainable in PMC 2014 April 11.Figure two.Isotropic C) Raman (A), anisotropic Raman (B), IR (C), and VCD (D), band profiles from the amide I’ mode of cationic AAA (left column), zwitterionic (middle column) and anionic (correct column) in D2O. The Raman profiles have been taken from Eker et al.48 The strong lines outcome from the simulation described within the text.Toal et al.PageNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptFigure 3.Contour plots depicting the conformational distribution in the central residues of (A) cationic AAA, (B) zwitterionic AAA, and (C) anionic AAA, as obtained from a combined evaluation in the amide I’ band profiles in Figures 1, the J-coupling constants reported by Graf et al.50 for the cationic state plus the 3J(HNH) continual for the zwitterionic state.J Phys Chem.
